|
U.S. federal government agencies have issued several sets of guidelines on
xenotransplantation:
- The Public Health Service division of the Department of Health and Human
Services (DHHS) first issued Guidelines on Infectious Disease Issues in
Xenotransplantation in September 1996, with periodic updates over the
years. The latest update was published in January 2001. These guidelines were jointly
developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Food and
Drug Administration (FDA), Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA),
National Institutes of Health (NIH), and the Office of the Assistant Secretary
for Planning and Evaluation of the DHHS. They outline xenotransplant protocol
issues, including animal sources for xenotransplantation, clinical issues and
public health needs. They also detail the special requirements of the informed
consent process for prospective xenotransplant recipients, as well as describe
the development of a pilot project for a National Xenotransplant Database.
- In February 2001, the FDA's Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research
division published its Draft Guidelines for Industry: Source Animal,
Product, Preclinical, and Clinical Issues Concerning the Use of
Xenotransplantation Products in Humans. These guidelines reiterate
much information from the PHS Guidelines, but also detail more specific advice
regarding xenotransplant products and procedures. This committee also issued
Guidance for Industry: Public Health Issues Posed by the Use of Nonhuman
Primate Xenografts in Humans,
as well as Guidance for Industry: Precautionary Measures to Reduce the
Possible Risk of Transmission of Zoonoses by Blood and Blood Products from
Xenotransplant Product Recipients and Their Contacts.
Although these guidelines will likely be closely followed by those proposing
xeno experiments, they are voluntary and may not be binding for privately
funded experiments. Responsibility for ensuring that a researcher follows the
proper protocol often falls to the regulatory bodies of the local institution
where the research is being carried out, known as Institutional Review Boards
(IRBs). The proposal may have to be reviewed additionally by the location's
Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC), as well as the
Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC).
U.S. federal agencies have set up two bodies to facilitate public discussion of
the issues surrounding xenotransplantation:
- In 1997, the FDA's Biological Response Modifiers Advisory Committee created a
Subcommittee on Xenotransplantation, which holds open public meetings to
discuss the scientific, medical, social, ethical, and public health concerns
surrounding xenotransplantation.
- The Department of Health and Human Services created the Secretary's
Advisory Committee on Xenotransplantation (SACX) in July 1999. The SACX is
comprised of 18 voting members from fields including xenotransplantation,
epidemiology, virology, microbiology, infectious diseases, veterinary medicine,
immunology, law, bioethics, patient advocacy, and animal welfare. It also
holds open public meetings to discuss xenotransplantation's public health
implications.
The process of educating a subject before a clinical research procedure is
known as informed consent. It is important for the patient to fully understand
the risks as well as the potential benefits before agreeing to undertake any
experimental procedure.
- The Department of Health and Human Services has issued General Guidelines
for Informed Consent, which
outline the information the subject must be provided, including any potential
risks and/or benefits, as well as any alternative procedures that could benefit
the patient. Signing an informed consent document does not mean that the
subject has relinquished his legal rights or released the sponsor from
liability.
- The Declaration of Helsinki describes the World Medical Association's guidelines for biomedical research
involving human subjects. While it acknowledges "Medical progress is based on
research which ultimately must rest in part on experimentation involving human
subjects" the document also states "The subjects must be volunteers and
informed participants in the research project."
home · four patients · the risks · animal welfare · the business · the regulators
discussion · faqs · video · chronology · interviews
synopsis · tapes & transcripts · press · credits · carlton's organ farm
FRONTLINE · pbs online · wgbh
web site copyright WGBH educational foundation
|