| | |
The American media generally pays attention to America's heartland only when
there is a "newsworthy" crisis, such as the stand-off in Montana between FBI
agents and self-styled Freemen. What was not adequately covered in the nation's
news was the long buildup to that crisis, a lengthy drought coupled with a
severe economic downturn that began to hit farm country in the early 1980's and
caused many rural countries to lose 20-30 percent of their population by the
end of the decade. Most who left were farmers and ranchers forced off the land.
And what the media missed entirely, what perhaps only a rural denizen could
have understood, was that the Freeman debacle had begun with classic
intergenerational tensions over a family ranch, not unlike those felt by Darrel
Buschkoetter and his wife Juanita as they arranged to take over the land that
his father had farmed for many years. In Montana, unfortunately, the family
tensions were fueled by an injection of the radical ideology of tax protesting,
with tragic results. In Nebraska, the Buschkoetters, as documented by this
remarkable film, are managing to work things out amongst themselves.
To me, this film is true "reality television," in that it makes visible the
realities of rural life, slaughtering in the process any romantic notion of
farms and small towns as placid, idyllic places. And even the most urban of
viewers might begin to comprehend that while the landscapes of marriage and
relations with one's relatives are tough for anyone to navigate, when a third
generation family farm is involved, with a string of drought years wiping away
most cash income, people can feel trapped, and hopelessly overburdened. I came
to feel trapped, for a time, along with the Buschkoetters, as they fretted over
a broken down washing machine and aging pick-up truck, an emptying pantry and
an increasing debt load for animal feed, for tractor fuel, for the seed
necessary to plant another crop.
There is no narrator to smooth things over, to summarize what the Buschkoetters
might be feeling. At first I resented this, as it would have made things easier
on me as the viewer. But as I stayed with the film, I grew increasingly
grateful that the filmmakers had asked me to witness the day in, day out
hardships of life on an apparently marginal dry land farm. I came to see that
the farm is not marginal to the people who live there, but is worth fighting
for. A line that I might have skipped over in a newspaper article, a statistic
about how farmers have become increasingly dependent on off-farm income, became
uncomfortably real to me as I watch Darrel Buschkoetter try to maintain both a
grueling factory job and full-time farming. And I watched with burgeoning hope
as Juanita Buschkoetter began to realize her potential as a farm manager,
taking on the difficult task of financial planning, dealing with bankers and
FMHA loan agents to see if there was any hope of the farm remaining viable. The
fact that it took six months for her to receive an answer about a loan will not
surprise anyone who has ever dealt with the entrenched bureaucracy of the
federal agriculture programs.
My grandfather practiced medicine for fifty-five years in an isolated town in
northwestern South Dakota. Whenever he would bring in a partner, usually
younger physicians, my grandmother always used to say that it was the wives who
would determine whether or not they would stay. Rural life asks a great deal of
women, and its rewards are not always evident to outsiders. Juanita
Buschkoetter's own family clearly wanted "better things" for her, and fail to
comprehend why she would stay on the land, unable to enjoy the comforts that
middle-class Americans take for granted: an automatic dishwasher, new clothes
instead of used, an occasional candy bar for one's children. I winced at the
brutality of the remark addressed to her at the local grain elevator, when a
man sneered at her pregnant body, and said: "Don't you think that two children
are enough?" But I also recognized it as the sort of indignity any woman on a
struggling farm might encounter in the nearest market town.
One of the great strengths of this documentary is that it tells the truth about
what it takes to make a marriage. When the going gets rough, the Buschkoetters
are smart enough to realize that they need help, and turn to their priest and,
briefly, a marriage counselor. One of the most moving revelations to unfold in
the film is the way in which Darrel and Juanita also come to recognize that
ultimately, the marriage is up to them. They are only two people who can make
it work. And like the farm, their marriage is worth fighting for, even if it
means change, even if it means discarding the old idol of "the way we've always
done it," or "the way our parents did it." I was also struck by Juanita's
profound observation that as bad as their financial crisis had been, it was of
little significance compared to the crisis in their marriage. That's a family
value I can live with, knowing that people always matter more than money.
When rural women decide to pursue an education and career training they often
face terrific obstacles from the people closest to them. A mother-in-law might
make pointed remarks about attempting to reach above one's proper station in
life, a husband might feel so threatened as to resort to violent means of
keeping her a wife at home. It is a joy to watch Juanita Buschkoetter becoming
more her own person, even as she becomes more fiercely committed to her
marriage and the family farm. Her graduation ceremony at a community college
was for me the highlight of the film, not only because I had come to see how
hard-won her accomplishment was, but because her husband and children were all
so visibly proud of her.
Darrel Buschkoetter, like many farmers and ranchers, is accomplished enough as
a mechanic (and/or welder, electrician, veterinarian, etc.) that he might
easily trade the great gamble of farming for a better wage. The viewers of "The
Farmer's Wife" owe it to Darrel, and to themselves, to ask why it is that
family farmers are effectively penalized in the American economy for attempting
to grow the food that we eat. Why should people as hard-working as the
Buschkoetters have to turn to a charity in order to afford a $39.00 doctor
visit for their youngest child? Why is it that people can make (or lose) great
fortunes trading in the commodities markets, but the farmers who plant and
harvest those commodities can seldom receive a price that exceeds their cost of
production? Why is it that in 1998 farmers must sell their grain at 1940's
prices, and bread in the store costs sixteen times more than it did fifty years
ago? These questions nag at me. I hope the will nag at the viewer as well.
| |