|
| | |
| |
Jim Mokhiber provided reporting and research for "Secrets of an Independent
Counsel."
|
| |
| | |
This report was written in May 1998. The independent counsel statute expired on June 30, 1999. The new Justice Department rules eliminate the complex statutory requirements of the Ethics in Government Act described here, and grant the Attorney General far more discretion in deciding whether to appoint an outside prosecutor. |
Originally drafted in 1978 as part of the post-Watergate reform package known
as the Ethics in Government Act, the central purpose of the Independent Counsel
Act has been to remove the conflict of interest inherent in any effort by the
executive branch to investigate its own top officials.
The law applies primarily to fifty or so high-level executive branch
officials, including the President. Two discretionary clauses extend the reach
of the law: first, the Attorney General may initiate an independent counsel
investigation of Members of Congress "when it is in the public interest" to do
so; second, the Attorney General may invoke the law when an investigation of a
person by the Department of Justice could result in "a personal, financial or
political conflict of interest." In addition, other individuals not named in
the statute are often pulled into the investigation as prosecutors make their
case against a covered official.
Whenever the Attorney General "receives information sufficient to constitute
grounds to investigate" a covered official, he or she initiates an initial, or
"threshold," inquiry. If after thirty days the Attorney General determines
that the charges are not specific, or that their source is not credible, no
further action is taken. Otherwise, the Attorney General begins a "preliminary
investigation" of up to ninety days, extendable once for up to sixty days.
This investigation, however, is conducted without many of the standard
investigator's tools, including subpoenas, grand juries, plea bargains and
grants of immunity. After this period, the Attorney General must decide
whether there are reasonable grounds for recommending the appointment of an
independent counsel. If not, the Attorney General is obliged to take no
further action. Her decision is unreviewable, though new information might
trigger a new preliminary investigation.
If she decides there are reasonable grounds for further investigation, the
Attorney General turns to the body commonly known as the Special
Division, a panel of three federal appellate court judges charged with
appointing all independent counsels. As part of this "application" to the
Special Division, the Attorney General also makes a recommendation as to the
prosecutorial and investigative jurisdiction of the proposed independent
counsel.
The Special Division then appoints an independent counsel of its choosing,
reportedly selecting from a "talent book" which it maintains. Under the
statute, the independent counsel cannot be a government official, and must be
"an individual who has appropriate experience and who will conduct the
investigation and any prosecution in a prompt, responsible and cost-effective
manner." The Special Division then provides her or him with a charter setting
forth the independent counsel's jurisdiction. The subject and scope of the
investigation, and the identity of the independent counsel, are not routinely
released to the public, though press attention has in most instances persuaded
the Attorney General and the Special Division to provide such information.
Several investigations, however, have never been made public.
After being sworn in by the Special Division, the new independent counsel sets
up office and assembles a staff of prosecutors and investigators. Prosecutors
are often recruited from the Justice Department or the United States Attorney
offices located across the country. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
agents and other investigative staff are often detailed to the IC's offices.
The independent counsel then begins to investigate her or his case, using a
wide variety of prosecutorial techniques. If during the course of the
investigation the independent counsel discovers a need for looking into matters
not originally mentioned in the charter, she or he may decide to seek the
authority to do so in one of two ways. In the case of broad new areas of
inquiry, the independent counsel may request an "expansion of jurisdiction"
from the Attorney General, who is required to "give great weight" to the
independent counsel's recommendation. The Attorney General's decision is not
reviewable. For more narrow departures from an independent counsel's mandate,
the Special Division recently affirmed that he or she may opt to seek a
"referral of a related matter" from either the Attorney General or the
Special Division. In addition, the Attorney General may herself elect to refer
matters to the independent counsel. In this way, the scope of the
investigation may grow beyond the limits put forth in the original statement of
jurisdiction.
The independent counsel receives virtually all of the investigative and
prosecutorial powers of the Attorney General and other prosecutors and
officials of the Department of Justice. He or she is empowered to pursue
criminal matters in virtually any venue. In matters involving possible
impeachment proceedings, the independent counsel is required to pass along "any
substantial and credible information" to the House of Representatives.
As the name implies, the independent counsel works outside of the Department
of Justice system. Nevertheless, the IC is required to comply with Justice
Department policies "except to the extent that doing so would be inconsistent
with the purposes" of the law. Over the years, several forms of oversight have
been included in the law. ICs are required to file annual reports with
Congress and a final report with the Special Division. They are also required
to submit expense reports, and to submit to General Accounting Office (GAO)
audits every six months. An independent counsel can be removed from office by
the Attorney General "only for good cause, physical or mental disability...or
any other condition that substantially imparis the performance of such
independent counsel's duties." The independent counsel may appeal such
decisions, however, to the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.
More about the independent counsel procedures:
a diagram of the independent counsel process; the
text of the independent counsel statute
|
|